DUGAAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK TERHADAP IRIANA JOKO WIDODO DALAM CUITAN DI AKUN TWITTER @MIGRAN_TV_7777

Alya Faradita Putri, - (2023) DUGAAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK TERHADAP IRIANA JOKO WIDODO DALAM CUITAN DI AKUN TWITTER @MIGRAN_TV_7777. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Abstract

The development of technology in the field of communication has led to a surge in
the use of social media which has the potential to face problems in its
implementation, namely the rampant use of language that has legal implications.
More specifically, the problems to be studied in this research include the following
three things: (1) the illocutionary power of alleged acts of defamation against
Iriana Joko Widodo in tweets on the Twitter account @Migran_TV_7777; (2) the
implicature of alleged acts of defamation against Iriana Joko Widodo in tweets on
the Twitter account @Migran_TV_7777; (3) the level of validity of alleged acts of
defamation against Iriana Joko Widodo in tweets on the Twitter account
@Migran_TV_7777. In its implementation, this research uses the theoretical
approach of Pragmatics by utilizing qualitative methods. The data in this study are
sourced from tweets and comments on the Twitter account @Migrant_TV_7777.
The data collection instrument used in this research is a data card adapted to the
research needs. The collected data are then analyzed for illocutionary power,
speech implicature, and the level of validity of the speech using the Felicity
Conditions theory. The findings of this study are as follows. First, two types of
illocutionary force were found: assertive force, as many as 20 utterances, and
directive force, as many as three. The illocutionary power includes insinuating,
blaming, stating, accusing, and commanding. Second, 22 violations of the principle
of cooperation were found in 20 speech data. Overall, there are three implicatures
in the netizen's speech in the comment column of the Twitter account
@Migran_TV_7777, namely the implicature that the netizen dislikes, does not
accept, is annoyed, and is annoyed with Iriana's appearance. Second, there is an
implicature that the netizen intends to satirize, make fun of, insult, and slander
Iriana. Finally, there is an implicature that the netizen intends to provoke the public
to defame Iriana Joko Widodo as the speech partner. Third, based on the analysis
of the level of validity of the utterances, there is a fact that all utterances can be
declared as acts of defamation against Iriana Joko Widodo as stated in Article 27
paragraph (3) in conjunction with Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law No.9/2016 on
the Restriction of Law No.11/2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions
(ITE).

	Text S_IND_1905008_Title.pdf Download (190kB)
	Text S_IND_1905008_Chapter1.pdf Download (483kB)
	Text S_IND_1905008_Chapter2.pdf Download (555kB)
	Text S_IND_1905008_Chapter3.pdf Download (284kB)
	Text S_IND_1905008_Chapter4.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text S_IND_1905008_Chapter5.pdf Download (224kB)
	Text S_IND_1905008_Appendix.pdf Download (1MB)

Item Type:	Thesis (S1)
Additional Information:	ID SINTA Dosen Pembimbing: Kholid Abdullah Harras: 5993658 Mahmud Fasya: 5978112
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Iriana Joko Widodo, pencemaran nama baik, pragmatik, Twitter
Subjects:	P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics P Language and Literature > PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
Divisions:	Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra > Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia > Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (nonpendidikan)
Depositing User:	Alya Faradita Putri
Date Deposited:	22 Sep 2023 07:10
Last Modified:	22 Sep 2023 07:10
URI:	http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/106874

Actions (login required)

View Item