Zickry Maulana, - (2018) PERBANDINGAN METODE BAGIAN DAN METODE PROGRESIF TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR LARI SPRINT. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
![[img]](http://repository.upi.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Title.pdf Download (162kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Abstract.pdf Download (135kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Table_Of_Content.pdf Download (371kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Chapter1.pdf Download (144kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (643kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Chapter3.pdf Download (476kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (425kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Chapter5.pdf Download (134kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Bibliography.pdf Download (184kB) |
|
Text
S_PJKR_1403196_Appendix.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (3MB) |
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find out the comparison of part methods and progressive methods on learning outcomes of sprinting. The method used is a quasi-experimental method, population in class VII students of the 7th City Junior High School. The sampling technique of cluster sampling was 30 students, divided into 2 groups, group A and group B. Treatment given to group A used part method and group B treatment using the progressive method. Based on the results of calculations and data analysis both groups have an influence on learning outcomes. Evidenced by the results of hypothesis testing with a significance level of 0.05 group method part tcount = -3.1443 < ttable = 2.048 and the progressive method group tcount = -2.1586 < ttable = 2.048. The conclusions based on the average part method test better influence than the progressive method on learning outcomes of sprinting. ;---Tujuanpenelitianiniadalahuntukmengetahuiperbandinganmetodebagian dan metodeprogresifterhadaphasilbelajarlarisprint. Metode yang digunakanadalahmetode quasi eksperimen, populasi pada siswakelas VII SMP Negeri 7 Kota Bandung. Teknik pengambilansampelcluster samplingsebanyak 30 siswa, dibagimenjadi 2 kelompokyaitukelompok A dan kelompok B. Treatment yang diberikankepadakelompok A menggunakanmetodebagian dan treatmentkelompok B menggunakanmetodeprogresif. Berdasarkanhasilperhitungan dan analisis data keduakelompokmempunyaipengaruhterhadaphasilbelajar. Dibuktikandenganhasil uji hipotesisdengantarafsignifikansi 0,05 kelompokmetodebagianthitung = -3,1443 <ttabel = 2,048 dan kelompokmetodeprogresifthitung = -2,1586 <ttabel = 2,048. Simpulannyaberdasarkan uji rata-rata metodebagianlebihbaikpengaruhnyadari pada metodeprogresifterhadaphasilbelajarlarisprint.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | No. Panggil : S PJKR ZIC p-2018; Nama Pembingbing : I. Yudy Hendrayana, II. Sufyar Mudjianto; NIM : 1403196. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Metode bagian, metode progresif, hasil belajar lari sprint, Part method, progressive method, learning result of sprinting |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan > Jurusan Pendidikan Olahraga > Program Studi Pendidikan Jasmani, Kesehatan dan Rekreasi |
| Depositing User: | Zahra |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Feb 2020 07:53 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Feb 2020 07:53 |
| URI: | http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/47192 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |