Nugraha, Benny (2012) DISTANCE ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM EVALUATION AT UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA. S2 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
|
Text
t_bing_1009594_table_of_content.pdf Download (390kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
t_bing_1009594_chapter1.pdf Download (477kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://repository.upi.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
t_bing_1009594_chapter2.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (497kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
t_bing_1009594_chapter3.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
t_bing_1009594_chapter4.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
t_bing_1009594_chapter5.pdf Download (365kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
t_bing_1009594_bibiography.pdf Download (431kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The issues of quality in distance education and the lack of studies in distance program evaluation inspired the researcher to conduct a formative evaluation of the English Education Program (EEP) at Universitas Terbuka (UT). Conducted in a period from April to June 2012, the evaluation focused on the assessment of EEP performance in meeting the standards. Adapting the Discrepancy Evaluation Model from Provus (1969) with four evaluation stages, it assessed EEP performances in developing and implementing its program components including student, staff, objectives, content, delivery method, learning assessment, support systems, and facilities. Document analysis was conducted to describe EEP and to compare it with the standards. Next, cross-sectional surveys were administered to EEP students and administrators Returned responses from fifty-six students and sixteen administrators were used as the primary data for quantitative data analysis. The analysis revealed that the program implementation performance was not congruent with the standards. Discrepancies in EEP components were found in such components as support systems, learning assessment, and staff. This finding was supported by the results of content analysis of the open-ended question responses confirming that tutorial support should be provided for every course. The evaluation concluded that (1) EEP performances were not congruent with the standards, and (2) Discrepancies were found in EEP design and implementation of support systems, staff, and learning assessment. It suggested that improvement attempts be conducted on EEP components/subcomponents such as tutorial, staff, learning assessment, information and communication services, library services, and academic counseling
| Item Type: | Thesis (S2) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Nomor Panggil TBING NUG d-2012 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS |
| Subjects: | L Education > LC Special aspects of education |
| Divisions: | Sekolah Pasca Sarjana > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris S-2 |
| Depositing User: | Staf Koordinator 3 |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Jun 2014 03:51 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Jun 2014 03:51 |
| URI: | http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/8952 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |