THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS’ CONCEPT MASTERY AND SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL IN LEARNING GLOBAL WARMING AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR

Layyinah, Syifa Qalbiyatul (2017) THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS’ CONCEPT MASTERY AND SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL IN LEARNING GLOBAL WARMING AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Baca Full Text klik disini
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Title.pdf
Download (316kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Abstract.pdf
Download (205kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Table_of_Content.pdf
Download (224kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter1.pdf
Download (235kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan
Download (393kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter3.pdf
Download (696kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan
Download (569kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter5.pdf
Download (206kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Bibliography.pdf
Download (274kB)
[img] Text
S_IPSE_1300698_Appendix.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan
Download (1MB)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to obtain general descriptions about students’ concept mastery and scientific argumentation skill qualities in oral and written scientific argumentation in learning global warming; the correlation between oral and written scientific argumentation skill; the correlation between students’ concept mastery and scientific argumentation skill; and students’perspective towards their scientific argumentation skill. The method used in this study was descriptive correlational research. Seventh grade students from Sekolah Indonesia Kuala Lumpur were tested. Generally, the concept mastery based on Bloom Taxonomy revised mean score shows a satisfactory attainments level, with the range (59,6 ≤ score ≤ 74,22). Scientific argumentation quality determined based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern and the level based onErduran et al.,(2004). All argumentation levels from level 1 to level 5 could be identified both in oral and written.The most argumentation appeared in both oral and written scientific argumentation is relatively low (level 2 of 5 levels). The higher quality of scientific argumentation is in oral argumentatien, since oral argumentation gets higher percentage in level 4 and 5. Moreover, there is medium positive correlation (r = +0,594) between students’ concept mastery and oral scientific argumentation skill, and (r = +0,449) between students’ concept mastery and written scientific argumentation skill. Based on Likert scale on questionnaire and interview result, most students had positive perspective towards their scientific argumentation skill. Keywords: Concept Mastery, Scientific Argumentation Skill, Global Warming

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Additional Information: No. Panggil : S IPSE LAY p-2017; Pembimbing : I. Diana Rochintaniawati, II. Rika Rafikah Agustin; NIM : 1300698
Uncontrolled Keywords: Argumentasi Ilmiah, Pemanasan Global, Penguasaan Konsep
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Q Science > QH Natural history
Divisions: Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > International Program on Science Education
Depositing User: DAM STAF Editor
Date Deposited: 16 Aug 2018 08:35
Last Modified: 27 Aug 2018 03:14
URI: http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/30820

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item