Dewi, Nur (2016) SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN EVALUASI KINERJA PENGAJAR PROGRAM GENERAL ENGLISH MENGGUNAKAN METODE SMARTER DAN TOPSIS. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Title.pdf Download (18kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Abstract.pdf Download (191kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Table_of_content.pdf Download (258kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Chapter1.pdf Download (157kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://repository.upi.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (580kB) |
|
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Chapter3.pdf Download (231kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (936kB) |
|
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Chapter5.pdf Download (135kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Bibliography.pdf Download (137kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
S_KOM_1100330_Appendix.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (8MB) |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengimplementasikan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam mengevaluasi kinerja pengajar program General English dengan menggunakan metode SMARTER dan TOPSIS. Metode SMARTER digunakan untuk menentukan bobot dari masing-masing kriteria, dan metode TOPSIS digunakan sebagai perhitungan perangkingan pengajar. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu data kriteria dan data nilai pengajar. Data kriteria dan nilai pengajar tersebut didapatkan dari Laporan Kepuasan Pelanggan yang ada di Balai Bahasa UPI. Sedangkan untuk prioritas kriteria didapatkan dari hasil kuesioner yang disebarkan kepada peserta pelatihan program General English. Pada pengujian akurasi, penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode SMARTER-TOPSIS memiliki error rate sebesar 76%. Sedangkan untuk stabilitas, metode SMARTER-TOPSIS 90% stabil. Berdasarkan hasil angket, 4 dari 5 orang pihak manajerial Balai Bahasa UPI lebih memilih hasil perangkingan dengan metode SMARTER dan TOPSIS daripada dengan cara manual.;---This research have purpose for implementing decision support system for choosing General English program teacher using SMARTER and TOPSIS method. SMARTER method are used for determining weight of each criterion, where TOPSIS method are used for calculate teacher rank. The data used in this research consisted of criteria and lecturer score for each criterion. Both data are obtained from UPI Language Center Customer Satisfaction Report. Priority of criteria decided based on questionaire response from General English Program students. On accuracy aspect, the research shows that SMARTER-TOPSIS method has 76% error rate. This research also shows that SMARTER and TOPSIS method has 90% stability. Based on questionaire, 4 from 5 Balai Bahasa UPI’s management choose teacher’s rank from SMARTER and TOPSIS method rather than manual.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | No. Panggil: S KOM DEW s-2016; Pembimbing: I.Eka Fitrijaya, II.Rasim |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM), Simple Multi-Attribute Ratting Technique Exploiting Rank (SMARTER), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Evaluasi Kinerja Pengajar, Decision Support Systems, Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM), Simple Multi-Attribute Ratting Technique Exploiting Rank (SMARTER), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Performance Evaluating Teacher. |
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education T Technology > T Technology (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > Program Studi Ilmu Komputer |
| Depositing User: | Mr mhsinf 2017 |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Sep 2017 01:31 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Sep 2017 01:31 |
| URI: | http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/25721 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |