Muhammad Awaludin Nasution, - (2023) ARGUMENTASI SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PADA MATERI PROGRAM LINIER BERDASARKAN KELOMPOK SELF-EFFICACY DAN KEMAMPUAN AWAL MATEMATIS SISWA. S2 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
![[img]](http://repository.upi.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
T_MTK_2113042_Title.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
T_MTK_2113042_Chapter1.pdf Download (274kB) |
|
Text
T_MTK_2113042_Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (585kB) |
|
Text
T_MTK_2113042_Chapter3.pdf Download (370kB) |
|
Text
T_MTK_2113042_Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (5MB) |
|
Text
T_MTK_2113042_Chapter5.pdf Download (583kB) |
|
Text
T_MTK_2113042_Appendix.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui struktur argumentasi siswa SMA dalam pemecahan masalah matematis pada materi program linier berdasarkan kelompok self-efficacy dan kemampuan awal matematis siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI yang telah mempelajari materi program linier sebanyak 50 siswa dari salah satu SMA swasta di Kabupaten Bandung, Provinsi Jawa Barat. Instrumen pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu skala self-efficacy, nilai ujian tengah semester siswa, dan tes pemecahan masalah matematis untuk melihat ketercapaian indikator argumentasi dalam pemecahan masalah, serta pedoman wawancara. Hasil penelitian ini adalah: 1) kecenderungan tingkat self-efficacy matematis siswa berada pada kategori sedang; 2) kemampuan awal matematis siswa dominan pada kategori sedang; dan 3) semua siswa belum memenuhi indikator backing karena belum dikenalkan dengan metode penyelesaian lain seperti garis selidik, siswa dengan self-efficacy tinggi dengan berbagai kemampuan awal memenuhi lima dari enam indikator argumentasi, yang artinya kemampuan awal tidak terlalu memiliki peranan terhadap kemampuan argumentasi. Siswa dengan kemampuan awal tinggi dengan tingkatan self-efficacy yang berbeda mampu memenuhi ketercapaian lima dari enam indikator argumentasi, dapat dikatakan bahwa self-efficacy siswa tidak terlalu berperan dalam kemampuan argumentasi. Siswa dengan self-efficacy sedang dan rendah memiliki ketercapaian indikator argumentasi yang beragam, yaitu siswa dengan self-efficacy sedang dan kemampuan awal sedang belum memenuhi indikator rebuttal, siswa dengan self-efficacy sedang dan kemampuan awal rendah belum memenuhi indikator warrant, rebuttal, dan qualifier. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah guru hendaknya memperhatikan self-efficacy dan kemampuan awal matematis yang dimiliki siswa agar semua siswa dapat memaksimalkan potensi yang dimilikinya dalam pemecahan masalah. This study aims to determine the argumentation structure of high school students in mathematical problem solving on linear program material based on self-efficacy groups and students' prior mathematical abilities. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. The research subjects were grade XI students who had studied linear programming topic as many as 50 students from one of the private high schools in Bandung Regency, West Java Province. The data collection instruments used were self-efficacy scale, students' midterm exam scores, and mathematical problem-solving tests to see the achievement of argumentation indicators in problem solving, as well as interview guidelines. The results of this study are: 1) the tendency of students' mathematical self-efficacy level is in the moderate category; 2) students’ prior mathematical abilites are dominant in the moderate category; and 3) all students have not met the backing indicator because they have not been introduced to other solution methods such as crosshairs, students with high self-efficacy with various prior knowledge meet five of the six argumentation indicators, which means that prior knowledge ability does not really have a role in argumentation skills. Students with high prior knowledge ability with different levels of self-efficacy were able to meet the achievement of five of the six argumentation indicators, it can be said that student self-efficacy does not play a role in argumentation skills. Students with moderate and low self-efficacy have diverse achievement of argumentation indicators, namely students with moderate self-efficacy and moderate prior knowledge ability have not fulfilled the rebuttal indicator, students with moderate self-efficacy and low prior knowledge ability have not fulfilled the warrant, rebuttal, and qualifier indicators. The implication of this research is that teachers should pay attention to students' self-efficacy and prior knowledge mathematical abilities so that all students can maximize their potential in problem solving.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S2) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=list_works&hl=en&user=-EKC3T8AAAAJ ID SINTA Dosen Pembimbing Rizky Rosjanuardi : 0019016906 Endang Cahya Mulyaning A. : 0022066503 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Argumentasi Matematis, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis, Self-Efficacy Matematis, Kemampuan Awal Matematis Mathematical Argumentation, Mathematical Problem-Solving, Mathematical Self-Efficacy, Mathematical Prior Knowledge |
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools Q Science > QA Mathematics |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika |
| Depositing User: | Muhammad Awaludin nasution |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Dec 2023 03:49 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Dec 2023 03:49 |
| URI: | http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/113751 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |