ANALISIS PELANGGARAN PRINSIP KERJA SAMA DALAM TUTURAN ANTARA MASYARAKAT DAN APARAT (Studi Kasus Pada Tayangan Reality Show Lalu Lintas di Indonesia)

Husna Zakiyah, - and Bachrudin Mustafa, - and Vidi Sukmayadi, - (2024) ANALISIS PELANGGARAN PRINSIP KERJA SAMA DALAM TUTURAN ANTARA MASYARAKAT DAN APARAT (Studi Kasus Pada Tayangan Reality Show Lalu Lintas di Indonesia). S2 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Abstract

ABSTRAK Meningkatnya angka kasus pelanggaran lalu lintas dari tahun 2020 hingga 2022 menjadi hal yang menarik untuk dikaji lebih jauh bagaimana proses pelanggaran prinsip kerjasama dalam percakapan antara aparat kepolisian dan masyarakat serta faktor apa saja yang melatarbelakangi pelanggaran prinsip kerjasama tersebut. Dalam penelitian ini peneliti berfokus pada respon mitra tutur sebagai pelanggar lalu lintas dalam menghadapi penutur yang merupakan aparat kepolisian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi bentuk-bentuk pelanggaran prinsip kerja sama Grice (1975) dan Logical Fallacy Withey (2016) dalam tuturan masyarakat, khususnya pelanggar lalu lintas, dalam tayangan reality show "86" di net tv. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini yaitu, (1) Apa saja bentuk pelanggaran prinsip kerja sama Grice yang terjadi dalam tuturan masyarakat dalam tayangan "86", dan (2) Bagaimana tuturan masyarakat tersebut dikonstruksikan. Sumber data penelitian ini berasal dari transkrip tuturan masyarakat yang diambil dari episode-episode tayangan "86" di net tv. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan analisis konten. Kesimpulan temuan dari penelitian ini terdapat 51 tuturan yang melanggar prinsip kerja sama diantaranya pelanggaran maksim kuantitas sebanyak 14 data, pelanggaran maksim kualitas sebanyak 13 data, pelanggaran maksim relevansi sebanyak 14 data, dan pelanggaran maksim cara sebanyak 10 data. Konstruksi tuturan pelanggaran prinisp kerja sama ditemukan melalui logical fallacy diantaranya red herring, strawman fallacy, ad hominem, false dilemma, hasty generalization, prejudical language, argument from ignorance, slippery slope, bandwagon, appeals to authority, card stacking, begging the question, appeals to pity, guilt by assocation, sebab-akibat yang salah, post-hoc, false needs, and guilt by association. Pada temuan tersebut terdapat logical fallacy jenis red herring, false dilemma, slippery slope, prejudical language dan appeals to pity yang mendominasi. The increasing number of traffic violations from 2020 to 2022 presents an interesting phenomenon to further examine, particularly regarding the violation of Grice’s cooperative principles in conversations between police officers and the public, as well as the underlying factors contributing to these violations. This study focuses on the responses of interlocutors specifically traffic violators in their interactions with police officers. The aim of this research is to identify the forms of violations of Grice’s (1975) Cooperative Principles and Withey’s (2016) Logical Fallacies in the utterances of the public, particularly traffic violators, as featured in the "86" reality show broadcasted on NET TV. The research questions are: (1) What types of violations of Grice’s Cooperative Principles occur in the utterances of the public in the "86" television show? and (2) How are these utterances constructed? The data source for this study comprises transcripts of public utterances taken from several episodes of the "86" show on NET TV. This study employs a qualitative method using a content analysis approach. The findings reveal 51 utterances that violated the cooperative principles, including 14 instances of quantity maxim violations, 13 of quality maxim violations, 14 of relevance maxim violations, and 10 of manner maxim violations. The construction of these utterances often involved various types of logical fallacies, such as red herring, strawman fallacy, ad hominem, false dilemma, hasty generalization, prejudicial language, argument from ignorance, slippery slope, bandwagon, appeals to authority, card stacking, begging the question, appeals to pity, guilt by association, false cause, post hoc, false needs, and guilt by association. Among these, red herring, false dilemma, slippery slope, prejudicial language, and appeals to pity were the most dominant.

	Text T_LING_2002506_Title.pdf Download (627kB)
	Text T_LING_2002506_Chapter1.pdf Download (269kB)
	Text T_LING_2002506_Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (525kB)
	Text T_LING_2002506_Chapter3.pdf Download (383kB)
	Text T_LING_2002506_Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (750kB)
	Text T_LING_2002506_Chapter5.pdf Download (239kB)
	Text T_LING_2002506_Appendix.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (760kB)

Item Type:	Thesis (S2)
Additional Information:	https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=id&user=Q9EoILUAAAAJ SINTA ID : 5991800 SINTA ID : 5975463
Uncontrolled Keywords:	prinsip kerja sama, pelanggaran lalu lintas, logical fallacy, pragmatik cooperative principle, traffic violations, logical fallacy, pragmatics
Subjects:	L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions:	Sekolah Pasca Sarjana > Linguistik S-2
Depositing User:	Husna Zakiyah
Date Deposited:	20 Aug 2025 02:12
Last Modified:	20 Aug 2025 02:18
URI:	http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/135869

Actions (login required)

View Item