Rahmawati Dewi, - and Ana Ratna Wulan, - and Kusnadi, - (2025) PROFIL ASESMEN EPISTEMIK SAINS UNTUK KOMPETENSI MENYELIDIKI, MENGEVALUASI, DAN MENGGUNAKAN INFORMASI ILMIAH DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN DAN TINDAKAN PADA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI SMA. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menghasilkan profil asesmen epistemik sains yang berfokus pada kompetensi menyelidiki, mengevaluasi, dan menggunakan informasi ilmiah dalam pengambilan keputusan dan tindakan pada pembelajaran biologi. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari 225 siswa kelas X dan XI dari sekolah berakreditasi A, B, dan C di kota Bandung dan Cimahi yang memiliki pengalaman mengikuti pembelajaran berbasis kerja ilmiah. Instrumen penelitian berupa kuesioner skala 1–4, disebarkan melalui Google Form dan kertas. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan disajikan dalam bentuk grafik dan tabel. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa pengalaman belajar epistemik lebih sering dilakukan di sekolah berakreditasi A dan B, namun masih jarang di sekolah berakreditasi C. Siswa berakreditasi A menonjol dalam pemeriksaan sumber informasi, siswa berakreditasi B aktif menghubungkan data dengan argumen, sedangkan siswa berakreditasi C cenderung menyusun pendapat berdasarkan pengalaman pribadi. Meskipun demikian, beberapa aspek masih jarang dilakukan di semua akreditasi, seperti penggunaan informasi terbaru, mempertimbangkan kredibilitas penulis, menemukan kesalahan informasi, mengkritik argumen berdasarkan bukti, membenarkan keputusan dengan data ilmiah, berkontribusi dalam diskusi dengan solusi, serta mengaitkan pelajaran biologi dengan masalah nyata. Kondisi ini menunjukkan bahwa keterampilan evaluatif terhadap sumber informasi masih rendah. Sementara itu, pengalaman asesmen epistemik umumnya sering dilakukan dengan bentuk penugasan berupa laporan praktikum dan esai. Sumber informasi paling banyak digunakan dari situs web. Kendala yang dihadapi meliputi kesulitan mencari informasi relevan, keterbatasan waktu, dan minimnya umpan balik. Siswa mengharapkan adanya panduan yang jelas, waktu yang memadai, dan umpan balik informatif untuk meningkatkan kualitas asesmen epistemik. This study aims to analyze and generate a profile of epistemic science assessment that focuses on the competencies of investigating, evaluating, and using scientific information in decision-making and action in biology learning. The research method used a descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The research subjects consisted of 225 students in grades 10 and 11 from schools accredited A, B, and C in the cities of Bandung and Cimahi who had experience participating in scientific work-based learning. The research instrument was a questionnaire scaled 1–4, distributed via Google Forms and paper. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and presented in graphs and tables. The results show that epistemic learning experiences are more frequent in schools accredited A and B, but are still rare in schools accredited C. Students with accreditation A excel in examining information sources, students with accreditation B actively connect data with arguments, while students with accreditation C tend to formulate opinions based on personal experience. However, several aspects are still rarely carried out across all accreditations, such as using the latest information, considering the credibility of the author, finding misinformation, criticizing arguments based on evidence, justifying decisions with scientific data, contributing to discussions with solutions, and linking biology lessons to real-world problems. This condition indicates that evaluative skills regarding information sources are still low. Meanwhile, epistemic assessment experiences are often conducted through assignments such as lab reports and essays. The most common source of information is websites. Challenges encountered include difficulty finding relevant information, time constraints, and minimal feedback. Students expect clear guidance, adequate time, and informative feedback to improve the quality of epistemic assessment.
![[thumbnail of S_BIO_2109816_Title.pdf]](http://repository.upi.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png "S_BIO_2109816_Title.pdf") |
Text
S_BIO_2109816_Title.pdf Download (4MB) |
|
Text
S_BIO_2109816_Chapter1.pdf Download (6MB) |
|
Text
S_BIO_2109816_Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (11MB) |
|
Text
S_BIO_2109816_Chapter3.pdf Download (5MB) |
|
Text
S_BIO_2109816_Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (21MB) |
|
Text
S_BIO_2109816_Chapter5.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
S_BIO_2109816_Appendix.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (4MB) |
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=9Qbygl8AAAAJ ID SINTA Dosen Pembingbing: Ana Ratna Wulan: 0017047402 Kusnadi: 0009056801 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asesmen epistemik, berpikir ilmiah, menyelidiki informasi, mengevaluasi informasi, menggunakan informasi. epistemic assessment, scientific thinking, investigating information, evaluating information, using information |
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > Program Studi Biologi - S1 > Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi |
| Depositing User: | Rahmawati Dewi |
| Date Deposited: | 28 Aug 2025 02:52 |
| Last Modified: | 28 Aug 2025 02:52 |
| URI: | http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/136624 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |