RIDHA, Fachru (2013) NAZARUDDIN’S CASE: THE JAKARTA POST REPORTS ON A BRIBERY ATTEMPT CASE. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
|
Text
s_ing_0707804_table_of_contents.pdf Download (206kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
s_ing_0707804_chapter1.pdf Download (320kB) | Preview |
|
Text
s_ing_0707804_chapter2.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (458kB) |
||
|
Text
s_ing_0707804_chapter3.pdf Download (562kB) | Preview |
|
Text
s_ing_0707804_chapter4.pdf Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan Download (1MB) |
||
|
Text
s_ing_0707804_chapter5.pdf Download (290kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
s_ing_0707804_bibliography.pdf Download (243kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The aims of this study entitled “Nazaruddin Case: The Jakarta Post Reports on a Bribery Attempt Case” are to describe The Jakarta Post schemata in reporting the case, to investigate how the major participants are reported in the texts, and to uncover meanings constructed from the text. The study focuses on news reporting Nazaruddin’s bribery attempt case which has been published by English news sites in Indonesia: The Jakarta Post (www.thejakartapost.com). Five related articles have been selected. The analyses of these reports comply with the frameworks of Critical Discourse Analysis, especially Van Dijk framework, Sociogognitive Approach (SCA) (2009). First, macropropositions and news schemata are examined, described, and interpreted on the level of macrostructure and superstructure.These levels are used to see the ways of Nazaruddin case are reported in the text. Then, these are followed by an examination of participants based on the representations using microstructure analysis. Finally, these three levels of analysis will lead this study to uncover meaning constructed from the text. The study finds that, based on macrostructure and superstructure analysis, The Jakarta Post reports the news carefully and the readers are left to draw their own conclusions. Meanwhile, based on microstructure analysis, the major participants in the text are Nazaruddin and Mahfud. Nazaruddin is represented negatively, while Mahfud is represented positively. It means The Jakarta Post dislikes what Nazaruddin has done. In addition, negative representation of Nazaruddin influences the representation of institution in which he worked in. Key Words: The Jakarta Post, discourse, macrostructure, superstructure, microstructure, and meaning.
Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | No Panggil SING RID n-2013 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | The Jakarta Post, discourse, macrostructure, superstructure, microstructure, and meaning. |
Subjects: | P Language and Literature > PE English |
Divisions: | Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra > Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris > Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris |
Depositing User: | Staf Koordinator 2 |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jul 2014 07:14 |
Last Modified: | 07 Jul 2014 07:14 |
URI: | http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/10604 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |