KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI DAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN SISWA SMA KELAS X MENGENAI PERMASALAHAN PENGGUNAAN PESTISIDA SINTETIS

    Muhammad Ihsan Alawi, - (2018) KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI DAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN SISWA SMA KELAS X MENGENAI PERMASALAHAN PENGGUNAAN PESTISIDA SINTETIS. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

    Abstract

    Berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 pembelajaran Biologi mengharuskan siswa
    untuk mengembangkan keterampilan berfikir. Kompetensi tersebut
    dapat dilihat dari bagaimana kemampuan berargumentasi dan
    pengambilan keputusan siswa. Tujuan dari dilakukannya penelitian ini
    adalah untuk menganalisis sejauh mana tingkat kemampuan argumentasi
    dan pengambilan keputusan siswa SMA kelas X mengenai
    permasalahan penggunaan pestisida sintetis. Penelitian ini merupakan
    jenis penelitian deskriptif yang melibatkan sejumlah siswa kelas X di
    salah satu SMA di Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Pemilihan lokasi karena
    lokasi sekolah yang dekat dengan sentra pertanian. Data kemampuan
    argumentasi diperoleh dari jawaban soal uraian dan data kemampuan
    pengambilan keputusan diperoleh menggunakan angket. Hasil
    kemampuan argumentasi menunjukkan bahwa claim, data dan warrant
    merupakan tiga komponen argumentasi yang paling banyak siswa
    munculkan, sehingga berdasarkan pencapaian siswa tersebut, sebanyak 79,41% atau sebagian besar argumentasi siswa digolongkan kedalam
    level 2. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan argumentasi siswa
    dinyatakan cukup. Selanjutnya untuk kekuatan argumentasi siswa pada
    umumnya berada pada kategori kurang koheren (KK) atau argumentasi
    siswa baru memiliki claim yang logis dengan hanya didukung oleh salah
    satu ground yang logis (warrant, data atau backing). Sementara itu
    claim siswa yang muncul pada setiap soal umumnya bernilai benar.
    Untuk hasil kemampuan pengambilan keputusan berdasarkan 5 indikator
    kemampuan pengambilan keputusan, didapatkan data dengan rata-rata
    nilai persentase sebesar 73,85% atau masuk kedalam kriteria tinggi.
    ;---Based on the 2013 curriculum, Biology learning requires students to
    develop thinking skills. This competency can be seen from how students
    are able to argue and make decisions. The purpose of this study was to
    analyze the extent of the level of argumentation and decision-making
    abilities of 10th grade high school students about the problem of using
    synthetic pesticides. This research is a type of descriptive research
    involving a number of 10th grade students in one of the secondary
    schools in West Bandung Regency. This research location was chosen
    since the school is close to the agricultural center. The data of
    argumentation skills was obtained from a descriptive question and
    answer method while the data of decision-making skills was collected using a questionnaire. The results of argumentation skills show that
    claims, data and warrant are three components of argumentation that
    most students come up with, so that based on the student's achievement,
    as much as 79.41% or most student arguments are classified into level 2.
    This result show that students' argumentation skills were considered to
    be adequate. Furthermore, the strength of student argumentation was
    generally included in the less coherent category, where argumentation of
    students had a logical claim with only was supported by one logical
    ground (warrant, data or backing). Meanwhile, the claim of students
    which appeared on each question was generally in true value. For the
    results of decision-making abilities, based on 5 indicators of decisionmaking
    abilities, the data were obtained with the average percentage of
    73.85% or included in high criteria.

    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Title.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Title.pdf

    Download (99kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Abstract.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Abstract.pdf

    Download (270kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Table_Of_Content.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Table_Of_Content.pdf

    Download (148kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Chapter1.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Chapter1.pdf

    Download (230kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Chapter2.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Chapter2.pdf
    Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

    Download (299kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Chapter3.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Chapter3.pdf

    Download (281kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Chapter4.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Chapter4.pdf
    Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

    Download (546kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Chapter5.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Chapter5.pdf

    Download (140kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Bibliography.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Bibliography.pdf

    Download (343kB)
    [thumbnail of S_BIO_1401781_Appendix.pdf] Text
    S_BIO_1401781_Appendix.pdf
    Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

    Download (167kB)
    Official URL: http://repository.upi.edu
    Item Type: Thesis (S1)
    Additional Information: No. Panggil : S BIO MUH k-2018; Nama Pembimbing : I. Taufik Rahman, II. Mimin Nurjhani; NIM : 1401781.
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Argumentasi, Pengambilan Keputusan, Permasalahan penggunaan pestisida sintetis, Argumentation, Decision Making, Problems with the use of synthetic pesticides
    Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
    Divisions: Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > Program Studi Biologi - S1
    Depositing User: Ryan Taufiq Qurrohman
    Date Deposited: 10 Feb 2020 03:03
    Last Modified: 10 Feb 2020 03:03
    URI: http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/46063

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item