eprintid: 58085 rev_number: 17 eprint_status: archive userid: 180353 dir: disk0/00/05/80/85 datestamp: 2021-01-07 03:57:57 lastmod: 2021-01-07 03:57:57 status_changed: 2021-01-07 03:57:57 type: thesis metadata_visibility: show creators_name: La Ode Amril, - creators_id: laode.amril27@gmail.com contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS contributors_name: Darhim, - contributors_name: Dadang Juandi, - contributors_id: darhim@upi.edu contributors_id: dadang.juandi@upi.edu title: PENGEMBANGAN MODEL EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING BERBASIS CONCRETE-PICTORIAL-ABSTRACT (EL-CPA) UNTUK PENGUASAAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA DAN SIKAP MATEMATIKA SISWA TUNA RUNGU DI SEKOLAH LUAR BIASA (SLB) ispublished: pub subjects: L1 subjects: LB1603 subjects: QA divisions: PMAT full_text_status: restricted keywords: Experiential Learning, CPA, tuna rungu, pemahaman konsep matematika, sikap Matematika Experiential Learning, CPA, hard of hearing, understanding mathematical concepts, attitude mathematics. abstract: ABSTRAK La Ode Amril (2020). Pengembangan Model Experiential Learning berbasis Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (EL-CPA) untuk Penguasaan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika dan Sikap Matematika Siswa Tuna Rungu di Sekolah Luar Biasa (SLB). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk 1) mendeskripsikan karakteristik model EL-CPA yang dikembangkan pada pembelajaran matematika siswa tuna rungu; 2) mengetahui apakah produk model EL-CPA dan perangkat pendukungnya memenuhi kriteria valid; 3) mengetahui apakah produk model EL-CPA dan perangkat pendukungnya memenuhi kriteria praktis; 4) mengetahui apakah produk model EL-CPA dan perangkat pendukungnya memenuhi kriteria efektif ditinjau dari pemahaman konsep matematika siswa tuna rungu; dan 5) mengetahui apakah produk model EL-CPA dan perangkat pendukungya memenuhi kriteria efektif ditinjau dari sikap matematika siswa tuna rungu. Subjek penelitian adalah 20 siswa tuna rungu yang tersebar di tiga SLB-B di Kota dan Kabupaten Bogor. Uji coba produk pada skala kecil dilakukan di satu sekolah, yakni SLB-B Sejahtera Kabupaten Bogor, sedangkan uji coba produk skala luas dilakukan di tiga sekolah, yakni SLB-B Fitria (5 siswa), SLB-B Tunas Kasih 2 (10 siswa), dan SLB-B Dharma Wanita (5 siswa) yang terletak di Kota dan Kabupaten Bogor. Model Pengembangan Produk pada penelitian ini mengacu pada Design Research (DR) dengan pengolahan data menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensial (uji binomial). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) karakteristik model EL-CPA yakni model pembelajaran yang memberikan pengalaman langsung kepada siswa tuna rungu dalam belajar, melibatkan hands-on dan minds-on activity, memanfaatkan potensi visual siswa tuna rungu, dan berpusat pada siswa; 2) produk model EL-CPA dan perangkat pendukungnya memenuhi kriteria valid; 3) produk model EL-CPA dan perangkat pendukungnya memenuhi kriteria praktis; 4) produk model EL-CPA dan perangkat pendukungnya memenuhi kriteria efektif ditinjau dari pemahaman konsep matematika siswa tuna rungu; dan 5) produk model EL-CPA dan perangkat pendukungya memenuhi kriteria efektif ditinjau dari sikap matematika siswa tuna rungu. Kata kunci: Experiential Learning, CPA, tuna rungu, pemahaman konsep matematika, sikap Matematika. ABSTRACT La Ode Amril (2020). Development Of Experiential Learning Model Based On Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (EL-CPA) For Strengthening Understanding Of The Mathematical Concept And Attitude Mathematics Hard Of Hearing Students In The Special School. This study aims to 1) describe the characteristics of the EL-CPA learning model developed in mathematics learning for deaf students; 2) determine whether the product of the EL-CPA learning model and its supporting devices meet valid criteria; 3) determine whether the product of the EL-CPA learning model and its supporting devices meet practical criteria; 4) determine whether the product of the EL-CPA learning model and its supporting devices meet the effective criteria in terms of understanding the mathematical concepts of deaf students; and 5) determine whether the product of the EL-CPA learning model and its supporting devices meet the effective criteria in terms of the mathematics attitudes of deaf students. The research subjects were 20 deaf students spread across three special school in Bogor City and Regency. Small-scale product trials were conducted in special school Sejahtera Bogor, while large-scale product trials were carried out in three schools, namely special school of Fitria (5 students), special school of Tunas Kasih 2 (10 students) , and special school of Dharma Wanita (5 students) located in the City and Regency of Bogor. The Product Development Model in this study refers to Design Research (DR) with data processing using descriptive and inferential analysis (binomial test). The results showed that 1) the characteristics of the EL-CPA learning model, namely a learning model that provides direct experience for deaf students in learning, involves hands-on and minds-on activity, utilizes the visual potential of Hard of Hearing students, and is student-centered; 2) the product of the EL-CPA learning model and its supporting devices meet valid criteria; 3) EL-CPA learning model products and supporting devices meet practical criteria; 4) the product of the EL-CPA learning model and its supporting devices meet the effective criteria in terms of understanding the mathematical concepts of Hard of Hearing students; and 5) the product of the EL-CPA learning model and its supporting devices meet the effective criteria in terms of the mathematics attitudes of Hard of Hearing students. Keywords: Experiential Learning, CPA, hard of hearing, understanding mathematical concepts, attitude mathematics. date: 2020-12-14 date_type: published institution: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia department: D_MTK thesis_type: doctoral thesis_name: phd official_url: http://repository.upi.edu related_url_url: http://perpustakaan.upi.edu related_url_type: org referencetext: Aiken,L, R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142. Akker., J. V. D., Banna, B., Kelly, A.,E., Nieeven, N., and Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design reserach: an Introduction. Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO). Akker., J. V. D.,Gravemeijer,K., McKenney, S., and Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design reserach. New york: Routledge. Ansell, E., & Pagliaro, C. M. (2006). The relative difficulty of signed arithmetic story problems for primary level deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 153–170. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton: Open University Press, Keynes. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour, Prentice Hall. Allen, T. E. (1995). Demographics and national achievement levels for deaf and hard of hearing students: Implications for mathematics reform. In C. H. Dietz (Ed.), Moving toward the standards: A national action plan for mathematics education reform for the deaf: 41–49. Washington, DC: Pre-College Programs, Gallaudet University. Allen, M.J. & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, CA: A Division of Wadsworth, Inc. Arends, R., I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Armstrong, S. J. & Fukami, C. (2008). Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development. London: Sage Publications. Aron, L & Loprest, P. (2012). Disability and the Education System. SPRING, 22(1), 97-122. Ates, O & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). Effectiveness of hands-on and minds-on activities on students’ achievement and attitudes towards physics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol 12. (1-22). Austin, J., M. & Rust, Z., D. (2015). Developing an Experiential Learning Program: Milestones and Challenges. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(1), 143-153. Azmidar A., Darhim D & Dahlan J.,A. (2017). Enhancing Students’ Interest through Mathematics Learning.. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 895 01207. Azwar, S. (2010). Tes prestasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiplecomponent model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory .Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Bartle, E. (2015). Experiential learning: an overview. Australia: the university of Queesland. Batshow, M.L. (1997). Children with disabilities (4th ed). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Beyer, L. E. (1984). Field experience, ideology, and the development of critical reflectivity. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 36–41. Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(2), 99–111. Borgna, G. et al. (2011). Enhancing deaf students’ learning from sign language and text: Metacognition, modality, and the effectiveness of content scaffolding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 16:79–100. Carpenter, P.,T. & Lehrer, R (2009). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. London: Lawrence Erbalum Associates, Publishers. Carrano A. L., Dannels W. A., & Marshall M.W, (2014). Integration of experiential learning to develop problem solving skills in deaf and hard of hearing STEM students. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis: American Society for Engineering Education. Chambers, P. (2013). Teaching mathematics: developing as a reflektive secondary teacher.(2nd ed). London: Sage Publication inc. Chinn, S. (2010). Addressing the unproductive classroom behaviours of students with special needs. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Ciubal-Fulgencio, NR, Tan, DA. (2018).” Mathematics Communication Strategies: Effects on Attitudes and Performance of Grade 8 Students”. Asian Academic Research Journal of Multidisciplinary, vol.5, no. 2. Cloutier, A., Dwyer, G., J, and Sherrod, S. (2016). Exploration of Hands-On/Minds-On Learning in an Active STEM Outreach Program. American Society for Engineering Education, ASSE 123rd Annual. Conferrence and Exposition. Coker, P. (2010). Effects of an experiential learning program on the clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills of occupational therapy students. Journal of Allied Health, 39(4). 280-286. Connor, D & Sharma, J. (2017). Developing a concrete-pictorial-abstract model for negative number arithmetic. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 37(2), 1-6. Dale, E. (1969). Audio-visual methods in teaching. Austin, Texas: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Dean, Joan. (1996). Managing special needs in the primary school. London: Routledge. Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. The school journal. LIV(3):77-80 Downs, S., Owen, C., & Vammen N Anna. (2000). Make a differens: tips for teaching student who deaf or hard hearing. University of Arkansas at Little Rock: Little Rock, Arkansas. Easterbrooks, S. R., & Stephenson, B. (2006). An examination of twenty literacy, science, and mathematics practices used to educate students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 151(4), 385-397. Easterbrooks, S.R., & Putney, L. L. (2008). Development of initial and advanced standards of knowledge and skills for teachers of children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30(1), 5-11. Ebbutt, S. & Straker, A. (1995) Children and mathematics: Mathematics in primary school, Part 1. London: Collins Educational. Eyler, J. (2009). The power of experiential education. Liberal Education, 95(4), 24. Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Evaluation of educational program. Jakarta: National Education Planning, Evaluating and Curriculum Development. Flaherty, M., & Moran, A. (2004). Deaf signers who know Japanese remember words and numbers more effectively than deaf signers who know English. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(1), 39–45. Flores, M. M. (2010). Using the Concrete–Representational–Abstract Sequence to Teach SubtractionWith Regrouping to Students at Risk for Failure. Remedial and Special Education, 31(3), 195 -207. Freedman, J. L., Sears, D. O., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1989). Social psychology, (A. Donmez, Cev.), Ara Yayıncılık. Freudenthal, H. (1981). Major problems of mathematics education’ Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 133-150. Geary, D.C., Hoard, M.K., Nugent, L. & Byrd-Craven, J. (2007). Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 277–299. Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. Gherasim, R. L., Butnaru, S., Boza, M., & Iacob, L. M. (2011). Achievement and attitude towards mathematics in early adolescence: the role of classroom Environment and goal orientations. In The 7th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Educational (pp. 55–60). Romania: WSEAS Press. Giil, S., O & Vuran, S. (2015). Children With Special Needs’s Opinion and Problems About Inclusive Practices. Journal Education and Science, Vol 40, No 180, 169-195. Gilmore., C, Keeble., S, Richardson., S, & Cragg., L. (2017). The Interaction Of Procedural Skill, Conceptual Understanding And Working Memory In Early Mathematics Achievement, Journal Of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 400–416. Govindan, N., P. & Ramaa, S. (2014). Mathematical Difficulties Faced By Deaf/Hard Of Hearing Children. Conflux Journal of Education, 2(7), 28-38. Hafizianii, E., P. (2015). The Influence of Concrete Pictorial Abstract (CPA) approach to the mathematical representation ability achievement of the pre-service teachers at elementary school. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(6), 113-126. Hamilton, H. (2011). Memory skills of deaf learners: Implications and applications. American Annals of the Deaf 156 (4), 29-41. Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25-46. Harris, C.A., Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1995). Teaching initial multiplication skills to students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 180–196. Hasanah, A., Kusumah, S. Y., & Ulya, Z. (2017). The development of mathematics learning media for deaf students: preliminary implementation result. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA. Vol 22 (2). 33 – 37. Hershkowitz, R. (1990), Psychological aspects of learning geometry, in Mathematics and Cognition, Cambridge University Press. Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Hui, S., C, Hoe, N., L & Lee, P., K. (2017). Teaching and Learning with Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract Sequence – A Proposed Model. The Mathematics Educator, 17(2), 1-28. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Regulations Part 300/A/300.8. Section 300.8. Tersedia di ED.Gov. Isip, J., L. (2018). Comparison between Traditional Approach and Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) Approach in Teaching College Algebra. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 9(9), 1290-1294. Jarvis H.L & Gathercole S.E.(2003). Verbal and non-verbal working memory and achievements on National Curriculum tests at 11 and 14 years of age. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(3), 123-140. Jones, I., Inglis, M., Gilmore, C., & Evans, R. (2013). Teaching the substitutive conception of the equals sign. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 34–49. Joyce, B., & Weill, M. (1996). Models of teaching (6thed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Joyce, B., Weill, M., & Calhoun, E. (2004). Models of teaching (7thed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Kang, D., Y, & Martin, S., N. (2018). Improving learning opportunities for special education needs (SEN) students by engaging pre-service science teachers in an informal experiential learning course. Asia Pasific of Journal Education, 38(3), 319-347. Kemdikbud. (2017). Pedoman implementasi kurikulum 2013 pendidikan khusus: peraturan dirjen pendidikan dasar dan menengah tentang struktur kurikulum, kompetensi inti kompetensi dasar, dan pedoman implementasi kurikulum 2013 pendidikan khusus. Jakarta: Kemendikbud. Kemdikbud. (2016). Statistik Sekolah Luar Biasa (SLB). Jakarta: PDSPK Kemdikbud. Kirk, Samuel. A & Gallagher (1986), Educating Exceptional Children, Boston: Houghton Mifflin company. Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J.J., Coleman, M.R., & Anastasiow, N. (2012). Educating exceptional children. (13th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Klipatrik, J & Swafford, J. (2002). Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Knecht-Sabres, L. J. (2010). The use of experiential learning in an occupational therapy program: Can it foster skills for clinical practice? Occupational Therapy in Healthcare, 24(4), 320-334. Kritzer, K., L. (2013). Barely started and already left behind: A descriptive analysis of the mathematics ability emonstrated by young deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Educations, 14 (4): 409-420. Lang, H. G., & Pagliaro, C. (2007). Factors predicting recall of mathematics terms by deaf students: Implications for teaching. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 449–460. Lang, H.,G. (2012). Best Practices Science Education for Deaf Students. Department of Research National Technical Institute for the Deaf Rochester Institute of Technology. Lee, N. H., & Tan, B. L. J. (2014). The role of virtual manipulatives on the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract approach in teaching primary mathematics. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 8(2), 102-121. Lee, N. H., & Ferrucci, B. J. (2012). Enhancing learning of fraction through the use of virtual manipulatives. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 6(2), 126-140. Leong, Y. H., Ho, W. K., & Cheng, L. P. (2015). Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract: Surveying its origins and charting its future. The Mathematics Educator, 16(1), 1-18. Lewis, L.H. & Williams, C.J. (1994). In Jackson, L. & Caffarella, R.S. (Eds.). Experiential Learning: A New Approach (pp. 5-16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Lim, S. Y., & Chapman, E. (2012). Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 145-164. Liu (2006). Improving mathematics teaching and learning experiences for hard of hearing students with wireless technology–enhanced classrooms. MUSE. 151 (3); 345-355. Luckner, J., Bowen, S., & Carter, K. (2001). Visual teaching strategies for student who are deaf and hard of hearing. Teaching exceptional children. Vol. 33, (3), pp. 38-44. Luit, J., E., H. (2012). Mathematics for children in special needs education. SPRING, 22(1), 97-122. Ma, X. & Willms, J. D. (1999). Dropping out of advanced mathematics: How much do students and schools contribute to the problem? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(4), 365- 83. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47. Maccini, P., Mulcahy, C. A., & Wilson, M. G. (2007). A follow-up of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22 (1), 58–74. Maccini, P., & Ruhl, K. L. (2000). Effects of graduated instructional sequence on the algebraic subtraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 465–489. Majeed A., A, Darmawan, I., G., N & Linch, P. (2013). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory (ATMI), The Mathematics Educator. 15(1), 121-135. Marcelino, L., Costa, C., & Sousa, C. (2019). Cognitive Foundations Of Mathematics Learning In Deaf Students: A Systematic Literature Review. American Annals of the Deaf, 156(4), 46-58. Marlow, M. P., & McLain, B. (2011). Assessing the impacts of experiential learning on teacher classroom practice. Research in Higher Education Journal. 14, 1-15. Marques, J. P. (2007) . Applied statistics using SPSS, STATISTICA, MATLAB and R. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Marschark, M., & Everhart, V. (1999). Problem-solving by deaf and hearing students: Twenty questions. Deafness and Education International, 1, 65–82. Marschark M., Sapere, Patricia., and Mayer, Connie. (2009). Are deaf students’ reading challenges really about reading?. American Annals of the Deaf. 154:357–370. Marschark, M., Hauser, P. (2011). How deaf children learn: What parents and teachers need to know. Boston: Oxford University Press. Marschark, M., Morrison, C., Lukomski, J., Borgna, G., & Convertino, C. (2013). Are deaf students visual learners? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 156–162. Marschark, M., Spencer, J., Linda., Durkin, Andreana., Borgna, Georgiana., Conventino, Carol., Machmer, Elizabeth., Kronenberger, G., Wilian., and Trani, Alexandra. (2015). Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Educations, 20 (4), 310-330. Marschark, M., Sarchet, T., & Trani, A. (2016). Effects of Hearing Status and Sign Language Use on Working Memory. Journal of Deaf Studies dan Deaf Education. Vol 21 (2) : 148 – 155. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualisation. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 575-596). New York, NY: Macmillan. Mensah, J. K., Okyere M. and Kuranchie, A. (2013). Student attitude towards Mathematics and performance: Does the teacher attitude matter?. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol.4, No.3. 132-139. Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19–35. Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1992). Strategic math series: Place value. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises. Miller, S. P. and Hudson, P. J. (2007). Using evidence-based practices to build mathematics competence related to conceptual, procedural, and declarative Knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 47–57. Ministry of Education. (1990a). Mathematics syllabus (Primary). Singapore: Author. Moenikia, M. & Zahed-Babelan, A. (2010). A study of simple and multiple relations between mathematics attitude, academic motivation and intelligence quotient with mathematics achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2, 1537-1542. Morin, V. A., & Miller, S. P. (1998). Teaching multiplication to middle school students with mental retardation. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 22–36. NCTM. (1989). Principles and standarts for school mathematics. USA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standarts for school mathematics. USA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. Nino Richard R. Salingay, Denis A. Tan (2018). Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract Approach On Students’ Attitude And Performance In Mathematics. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, Vol 7. P (90-111). Nunally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.) . New York: McGraw Hill. Passarelli, A.,M. & Kolb. A, D. (1986). Using Experiential Learning Theory to Promote Student Learning and Development in Programs of Education Abroad. Case Western Reserve University: Stylus Publishing. Papanastasiou, C., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2004), Major influences on attitudes towards science, Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 3, 239–257. Pagliaro, C. M. (2006). Mathematics education and the dea learner. In D.F. Moores & D.S. Martin (Eds.), Deaf Learners: Developments in Curriculum and Instruction. 29–40. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press. Pagliaro, C.M. & Kritzer, K.L. (2010). Learning to learn: An analysis of early learning behaviours demonstrated by young deaf/hard-of-hearing children with high/low mathematics ability. Deafness & Education International, 12(2), 2–25. Pagliaro, C. M. (2010). Mathematics instruction and learning of deaf/hard-of-hearing students: What do we know? Where do we go? In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds), Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language and Education. 2, 156–171. New York: Oxford University Press. Pagliaro, C., M. & Kritzer, K., L. (2013). The math gap: a description of the mathematics performance of preschool-aged deaf/hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Educations, 18: 139-160. Peterson, S. K., Mercer, C. D., & O’Shea, L. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students place value using the concrete to abstract sequence. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 52–56. Pepin, B. (2011). Pupils’ attitudes towards mathematics: A comparative study of Norwegian and English secondary students. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43, 535-546. Permanarian, S & Herawati, T. (2004). Ortopedagogik Anak Tunarungu Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Proyek Pendidikan Tenaga Guru. Popham, W, J. (1995). Classroom assessment what teacher need to know. USA: Allin and Bacon A simon & Schuster Company. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. Raphael, D. and Wahlstrom, M. (1989). The influence of instructional aids on mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20(2), 173–190. Ray, E. (2001). Discovering mathematics: The challenges that deaf/ hearing impaired children encounter. ACE Paper (11). Dari https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz (p.p.62-75). Retnawati, H. (2012) . Mengembangkan bahan ajar matematika bagi siswa tunarungu tingkat SMP dalam Melaksanakan Sistem Pendidikan Inklusi di DI Yogyakarta. UNY: Yogyakarta. Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing. Rittle, J. B, Sieger, M., & Alibali, R. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 2: 346 – 362. Row, S. (2005). Surviving the Special Educational Needs System. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Robinson, K. M., & Dube, A. K. (2013). Children’s additive concepts: Promoting understanding and the role of inhibition. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 101-107. Ruffell, M. Mason, J. & Allen, B. 1998. Studying Attitude to Mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35: 1-18. Sanyoto, B. (2015). Penggunaan Media Bermain “Bingo Pecahan” untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Kesamaan Nilai Pecahan Pada Siswa Tuna rungu. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 118-125. Salingay, N., R. & Tan, D., A. (2018). Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract approach on student’s attitude and performance in mathematics. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(5), 90-111. Slavin, R. E. (2005). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. 8th edn. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. Washington, D.C: Falmer Press. Sowell, E.J. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20(5), 498–505. Stiles, D. J., McGregor, K. K., & Bentler, R. A. (2012). Vocabulary and working memory in children fit with hearing aids. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 55, 154–167. Suydam, M.N. (1986). Manipulative materials and achievement. Arithmetic Teacher, 33(6), 10, 32. Swanwick, R., Oddy, A., & Roper, T. (2005). Mathematics and deaf children: An exploration of barriers to success. In Donna, F.S., James, W.T., Dee M,L. & Robert, A.M. (Eds). Problem solving ability in elementary school-aged children with hearing impairment. Journal of Educational Audiology. (15), 30-43. Tang, S. J. (2002). Working memory, language production rate, and reading comprehension of Chinese deaf readers. Bulletin of Special Education, 22, 155–169. The Salamanca Statement And Framework For Action On Special Needs Education, “World Conferenceon Special Needs Education: Access And Quality”. 1994. Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337–348. Triandis, H.C. (1971). Attitude and Attitude Change, Wiley and Sons Inc, New York. Utsumi, M., C., & Mendes, C.R. (2000), Short reports: researching the attitudes towards mathematics in basic education, Educational Psychology, 20, 2, 237–43. VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2005). Quantifying the context of assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates of teacher referral and a problem solving model of identification. School Psychology Review, 34, 161–183. Vernotica, J., G. (2014). Special Education: A Service, Not a Place. New Jersey: New Jersey School Boards Association. Vukovic, R. K., Fuchs, L. S., Geary, D. C., Jordan, N. C., Gersten, R., & Siegler, R. S. (2014). Sources of individual differences in children’s understanding of fractions. Child Development, 85(4), 1461-1476. Westwood, Peter S. (2008). A parent’s guide to learning difficulties : how to help your child. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: ACER Press. Witzel, B.S. (2005). Using CRA to Teach Algebra to Students with Math Difficulties in Inclusive Settings. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(3), 49-60. Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, M. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 121–131. Wood, D.,Wood, H., Griffiths, A., & Howarth, I. (1986). Teaching and talking with deaf children. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. World Bank Group: educational global ractice: toolkit for master trainers in preparing teacher for inclusive education for children with special needs. Macro Graphics Pvt. Ltd. Wulandari, A.,A, Dafik, dan Susanto. (2014). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik dengan whole brain teaching pada pokok bahasan teorema pythagoras untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan aktivitas siswa tunarungu kelas VIIIB SMPLB sinar harapan probolinggo tahun ajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Edukasi UNEJ. I (2): 40-46. Zan, R., & Di Martino, P. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 3, 157-168. citation: La Ode Amril, - (2020) PENGEMBANGAN MODEL EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING BERBASIS CONCRETE-PICTORIAL-ABSTRACT (EL-CPA) UNTUK PENGUASAAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA DAN SIKAP MATEMATIKA SISWA TUNA RUNGU DI SEKOLAH LUAR BIASA (SLB). S3 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/58085/1/D_MTK_1605373_Title.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/58085/2/D_MTK_1605373_%20Chapter1.docx.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/58085/3/D_MTK_1605373_Chapter2.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/58085/4/D_MTK_1605373_Chapter3.docx.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/58085/5/D_MTK_1605373_Chapter4.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/58085/6/D_MTK_1605373_Chapter5.docx.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/58085/7/D_MTK_16053673_Appendix.pdf