eprintid: 145219 rev_number: 21 eprint_status: archive userid: 220165 dir: disk0/00/14/52/19 datestamp: 2025-11-12 07:19:00 lastmod: 2025-11-12 07:19:00 status_changed: 2025-11-12 07:19:00 type: thesis metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Muhammad Bintang Kurniadi, - creators_name: Herwan Dermawan, - creators_name: Naufal Ariq Pratama, - creators_nim: NIM2100803 creators_nim: NIDN198001282008120992 creators_nim: NIDN0030089801 creators_id: bintangkurniadi@upi.edu creators_id: herwand@upi.edu creators_id: Naufalariqp@upi.edu contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS contributors_name: Herwan Dermawan, - contributors_name: Naufal Ariq Pratama, - contributors_nidn: NIDN198001282008120992 contributors_nidn: NIDN0030089801 contributors_id: herwand@upi.edu contributors_id: Naufalariqp@upi.edu title: ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN EFEKTIVITAS METODE PERBAIKAN TANAH LUNAK BERDASARKAN BIAYA, MUTU, DAN WAKTU : Studi Kasus Tangki BBM Kapasitas 5000 m³ ispublished: pub subjects: L1 subjects: TA divisions: SIP full_text_status: restricted keywords: Deep Soil Mixing, Efisiensi Biaya, Kolom Grout Modular, Manajemen Waktu, Pengurangan Settlement, Perbaikan Tanah Lunak, Stone Column Cost Efficiency, Deep Soil Mixing, Modular Grout Column, Settlement Reduction, Soft Soil Improvement, Stone Column, Time Management note: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=5aDEEh8AAAAJ&hl=en ID SINTA Dosen Pembimbing: Herwan Dermawan: 6003810 Naufal Ariq Pratama: 6963780 abstract: Penelitian ini membandingkan efektivitas tiga metode perbaikan tanah lunak, yaitu Stone Column, Kolom Grout Modular (KGM), dan Deep Soil Mixing (DSM) pada pembangunan tangki BBM berkapasitas 5000 m³, berdasarkan tiga aspek utama: biaya, mutu, dan waktu. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa ketiga metode dapat mengurangi penurunan tanah (settlement) di bawah batas yang diperbolehkan, yaitu 15 cm. Metode Stone Column menghasilkan pengurangan penurunan sebesar 14,08 cm dengan biaya Rp950.000.000 dan waktu pelaksanaan 84 hari. Kolom Grout Modular (KGM) memberikan penurunan 11,24 cm, namun dengan biaya lebih tinggi, yaitu Rp2.990.000.000 dan waktu pelaksanaan 105 hari. Sementara DSM mencapai penurunan 13,88 cm dengan biaya Rp1.030.000.000 dan durasi 91 hari. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, metode Stone Column dianggap paling efektif dan efisien, menawarkan keseimbangan terbaik antara biaya, mutu, dan waktu. This study compares the effectiveness of three soft soil improvement methods, namely Stone Column, Modular Grout Column (KGM), and Deep Soil Mixing (DSM), for the construction of a 5000 m³ fuel tank, based on three main aspects: cost, quality, and time. The analysis shows that all three methods successfully reduce soil settlement below the permissible limit of 15 cm. The Stone Column method results in a settlement reduction of 14.08 cm with a cost of IDR 950,000,000 and a construction time of 84 days. KGM provides a reduction of 11.24 cm, but with a higher cost of IDR 2,990,000,000 and a construction time of 105 days. Meanwhile, DSM achieves a settlement reduction of 13.88 cm, with a cost of IDR 1,030,000,000 and a duration of 91 days. Based on the analysis, the Stone Column method is considered the most effective and efficient, offering the best balance between cost, quality, and time. date: 2025-08-27 date_type: published institution: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia department: KODEPRODI22201#Teknik Sipil_S1 thesis_type: other thesis_name: other official_url: https://repository.upi.edu/ related_url_url: https://perpustakaan.upi.edu/ related_url_type: org citation: Muhammad Bintang Kurniadi, - and Herwan Dermawan, - and Naufal Ariq Pratama, - (2025) ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN EFEKTIVITAS METODE PERBAIKAN TANAH LUNAK BERDASARKAN BIAYA, MUTU, DAN WAKTU : Studi Kasus Tangki BBM Kapasitas 5000 m³. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/145219/1/S_TS_2100803_Title.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/145219/2/S_TS_2100803_Chapter%201.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/145219/3/S_TS_2100803_Chapter%202.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/145219/4/S_TS_2100803_Chapter%203.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/145219/5/S_TS_2100803_Chapter%204.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/145219/6/S_TS_2100803_Chapter%205.pdf document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/145219/7/S_TS_2100803_Appendix.pdf