TY - THES ID - repoupi139174 KW - Analisis genre kontrastif; presentasi lisan; rhetorical move; TED Talks Contrastive genre analysis; oral presentations; rhetorical moves; TED Talks ?? ?? ?? KW - ?? ?? KW - rhetorical moves KW - TED?? A1 - Intan Dwi Nur Akmaliyah, - A1 - Velayeti Nurfitriana Ansas, - A1 - Arif Husein Lubis, - PB - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia TI - ANALISIS KONTRASTIF STRUKTUR RETORIKA ANTARA VIDEO TED TALKS BERBAHASA KOREA DAN INDONESIA Y1 - 2025/08/21/ AV - restricted N2 - Keterampilan presentasi lisan, khususnya dalam konteks akademik, sangat penting karena mencerminkan siswa terhadap suatu topik serta kemampuan mereka dalam mengembangkan keterampilan komunikasi dan memenuhi tuntuan akademik tertentu. TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) Talks berfungsi sebagai media untuk menyebarkan pengetahuan dan menunjukkan kemampuan presentasi akademik. Meskipun analisis genre telah banyak diterapkan untuk mengkaji TED Talks, perbandingan rhetorical move antara TED Talks berbahasa Korea dan Indonesia belum banyak dieksplorasi secara mendalam. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi dan membandingkan rhetorical move dalam TED Talks berbahasa Korea dan Indonesia, termasuk occurences, salience. Selain itu penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan membandingkan pola retorika dalam TED Talks di kedua bahasa. Dengan menggunakan analisis genre berbasis korpus terhadap 20 video TED Talks (10 berbahasa Korea, 10 berbahasa Indonesia), kemudian dengan pendekatan pengkodean manual berdasarkan kerangka analisis move dari Chang dan Huang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Move 2 (Topic Introduction), Move 4 (Topic development), dan Move 7 (Aknowlegement/Gratituted) bersifat obligatory di kedua bahasa. Kesamaan juga ditemukan pada tingkat Step, di mana dalam engage in meta level discussion, outline structure, establish authority, show stance, dan offer an explanation tidak menjadi prioritas dalam kedua bahasa. Dalam hal pola Move-Step, pembicara Korea cenderung memulai presentasi mereka dengan membangun koneksi dengan audiens, sedangkan pembicara Indonesia umumnya memulai dengan mengambangkan konteks topik. Temuan ini menyoroti pengaruh bahasa terhadap struktur retorika dan menyarankan penerapan hasilnya dalam pengembangan bahan ajar yang bertujuan meningkatkan genre awareness dan keterampilan presentasi akademik di kalangan pembelajar bahasa asing. Oral presentation skills, especially in academic contexts, are highly important, as they reflect students? understanding of a topic and ability to develop their communication skills and fulfill specific academic requirements. TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) Talks serve as a medium for disseminating knowledge and demonstrating academic presentation skills. Although genre analysis has been widely applied to unpack TED Talks, the comparison of rhetorical moves between Korean and Indonesian TED Talks has not extensively explored. This study aims to identify and contrast rhetorical moves in Korean and Indonesian TED Talks, including its occurrences, salience, and patterns. This study employed a corpus-based genre analysis on 20 TED Talk videos (10 Korean, 10 Indonesian), using a manual coding approach based on Chang and Huang?s move analysis framework. The results show that Move 2 Topic Introduction, Move 4 Topic Development, and Move 7 Acknowledgements/gratitude were obligatory in both languages. Similarities also appear in the Step-level in which engaging audience in meta-level discussion, outlining structure, establishing authority, showing stance, and offering an explanation are not prioritized in both languages. In terms of the Move-Step patterns, while Korean speakers tend to begin their presentations by building a connection with the audience, Indonesian speakers typically start by developing the context of the topic. These findings highlight the influence of language on rhetorical structures and suggest potential applications in the development of teaching materials aimed at enhancing genre awareness and academic presentation skills among foreign language learners. ? ??? ???? ??????? ??? TED ??? ???? ??? ??(rhetorical moves)? ???? ???? ?? ???? ??. ?? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ?? ????, ???? ?? ???, ???? ??, ??? ?? ?? ??? ????. TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) ??? ??? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ? ?? ??? ????. ???? TED ??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??????, ???? ?????? TED ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?? ???? ??. ? ??? Chang? Huang? ??? ?? ?? ?? ???? ???? ?????? TED ?? ? 10??, ? 20?? ?? ???? ?????. ?? ??, Move 2(?? ??), Move 4(?? ??), Move 7(?? ??)? ? ?? ???? ????? ???? ????. ?? ?? ???? ??? ?????, ?? ??? ?????, ??? ??? ???? ??? ? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???. ??? ??? ?? ????? ??? ?????, ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?? ??, ?????? ???? ??? ??? ?? ???? ??? ???. ??? ??? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ? ??? ????, ??? ???? ?? ??? ??? ?? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??? ? ??? ????. M1 - other N1 - https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=PQIl798AAAAJ&hl=en ID SINTA Dosen Pembimbing Velayeti Nurfitriana Ansas: 6100520 Arif Husein Lubis: 6755247 UR - https://repository.upi.edu ER -