eprintid: 119277
rev_number: 46
eprint_status: archive
userid: 207531
dir: disk0/00/11/92/77
datestamp: 2024-07-29 04:38:21
lastmod: 2024-07-29 04:38:21
status_changed: 2024-07-29 04:38:21
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Bobby Pramjit Singh Dhillon, -
creators_nim: NIM1706561
creators_id: bobbydhillon17@upi.edu
contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS
contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS
contributors_name: Bachrudin Musthafa, -
contributors_name: Yanty Wirza, -
contributors_nidn: NIDN0010035702
contributors_nidn: NIDN0015017705
contributors_id: dinmusthafa@upi.edu
contributors_id: yantywirza@upi.ed
title: INVESTIGATING METACOGNITIVE KNOWLEDGE AND REGULATION IN INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC WRITING: Strategies and Attitudes
ispublished: pub
subjects: L1
subjects: LB2300
subjects: Z004
divisions: DBING
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Metacognitive strategies, Cognitive, Affective, Conative, Assessment
note: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=new_profile&hl=en
IDSINTA Dosen Pembimbing:
Bachrudin Musthafa: 5991800
Yanti Wirza: 6658778
abstract: This study aims to investigate the aspects of metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation identified in Indonesian university learners’ writing, as well as their attitudes (in terms of cognitive, affective, and conative) towards English writing instruction and tasks. The study involved 22 third-year English students in North Sumatra, Indonesia, using a mixed-method approach, collecting data through observations, questionnaires, reflective journals, interviews, and written texts. The first and second data were analysed by using observation, MAI questionnaire and reflective journals, while the third data were analysed by using questionnaire, interview, and observation. The results showed that declarative knowledge (with mean score: 0.85) was the most essential aspect of the metacognitive knowledge aspects. It indicated that students considered their capacities as learners, as well as their skills and intellectual qualities. Planning (with mean score: 0.84) was the most important aspect of metacognitive regulation. It implied that students were also good at setting, planning, and allocating focus before learning. Regarding the students’ attitude, the cognitive component analysis revealed 54.8% of participants shared their thoughts about the knowledge they had gained and how their statements corroborated it during the interview process. A percentage of 60.75% was found in the affective component analysis, indicating an optimistic attitude. In addition, the study of the conative component revealed a percentage of 58, 06%. Additionally, the analysis of the students’ written text indicated that the high-skilled and middle-skilled writers did not have difficulties implementing the metacognitive strategies. On the contrary, the low-skilled writers were unaware of these strategies. Overall, the students admitted that they needed more explicit coaching in metacognitive strategies to improve their writing competence. Moreover, their peers’ and teachers’ feedback were also helpful to improve their writing skills. EFL teachers in Indonesia can consider implementing metacognitive strategies in their instruction to help their students become stronger writers and more self-regulated language learners.
date: 2024-06-26
date_type: published
institution: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
department: KODEPRODI88003#Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris_S3
thesis_type: doctoral
thesis_name: phd
official_url: https://repository.upi.edu
related_url_url: https://perpustakaan.upi.edu/
related_url_type: org
citation:   Bobby Pramjit Singh Dhillon, -  (2024) INVESTIGATING METACOGNITIVE KNOWLEDGE AND REGULATION IN INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC WRITING: Strategies and Attitudes.  S3 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.   
document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/119277/1/D_BING_1706561_Title.pdf
document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/119277/8/D_BING_1706561_Chapter1.pdf
document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/119277/9/D_BING_1706561_Chapter2.pdf
document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/119277/10/D_BING_1706561_Chapter3.pdf
document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/119277/11/D_BING_1706561_Chapter4.pdf
document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/119277/12/D_BING_1706561_Chapter5.pdf
document_url: http://repository.upi.edu/119277/13/D_BING_1706561_Appendix.pdf