@phdthesis{repoupi106874,
           title = {DUGAAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK TERHADAP IRIANA JOKO 
WIDODO DALAM CUITAN DI AKUN TWITTER @MIGRAN\_TV\_7777},
            year = {2023},
           month = {July},
            note = {ID SINTA Dosen Pembimbing:
Kholid Abdullah Harras: 5993658
Mahmud Fasya: 5978112},
          school = {Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia},
        keywords = {Iriana Joko Widodo, pencemaran nama baik, pragmatik, Twitter},
        abstract = {The development of technology in the field of communication has led to a surge in 
the use of social media which has the potential to face problems in its 
implementation, namely the rampant use of language that has legal implications. 
More specifically, the problems to be studied in this research include the following 
three things: (1) the illocutionary power of alleged acts of defamation against 
Iriana Joko Widodo in tweets on the Twitter account @Migran\_TV\_7777; (2) the 
implicature of alleged acts of defamation against Iriana Joko Widodo in tweets on 
the Twitter account @Migran\_TV\_7777; (3) the level of validity of alleged acts of 
defamation against Iriana Joko Widodo in tweets on the Twitter account 
@Migran\_TV\_7777. In its implementation, this research uses the theoretical 
approach of Pragmatics by utilizing qualitative methods. The data in this study are 
sourced from tweets and comments on the Twitter account @Migrant\_TV\_7777. 
The data collection instrument used in this research is a data card adapted to the 
research needs. The collected data are then analyzed for illocutionary power, 
speech implicature, and the level of validity of the speech using the Felicity 
Conditions theory. The findings of this study are as follows. First, two types of 
illocutionary force were found: assertive force, as many as 20 utterances, and 
directive force, as many as three. The illocutionary power includes insinuating, 
blaming, stating, accusing, and commanding. Second, 22 violations of the principle 
of cooperation were found in 20 speech data. Overall, there are three implicatures 
in the netizen's speech in the comment column of the Twitter account 
@Migran\_TV\_7777, namely the implicature that the netizen dislikes, does not 
accept, is annoyed, and is annoyed with Iriana's appearance. Second, there is an 
implicature that the netizen intends to satirize, make fun of, insult, and slander 
Iriana. Finally, there is an implicature that the netizen intends to provoke the public 
to defame Iriana Joko Widodo as the speech partner. Third, based on the analysis 
of the level of validity of the utterances, there is a fact that all utterances can be 
declared as acts of defamation against Iriana Joko Widodo as stated in Article 27 
paragraph (3) in conjunction with Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law No.9/2016 on 
the Restriction of Law No.11/2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions 
(ITE).},
          author = {Alya Faradita Putri, -},
             url = {https://repository.upi.edu}
}