ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KINERJA KEUANGAN BANK KONVENSIONAL DAN BANK SYARIAH DENGAN METODE RGEC PERIODE 2015-2019

Julio Robih Pangestu, - (2021) ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KINERJA KEUANGAN BANK KONVENSIONAL DAN BANK SYARIAH DENGAN METODE RGEC PERIODE 2015-2019. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

[img] Text
S_PEM_1700396_Title.pdf

Download (476kB)
[img] Text
S_PEM_1700396_Chapter1.pdf

Download (242kB)
[img] Text
S_PEM_1700396_Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

Download (442kB)
[img] Text
S_PEM_1700396_Chapter3.pdf

Download (240kB)
[img] Text
S_PEM_1700396_Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

Download (540kB)
[img] Text
S_PEM_1700396_Chapter5.pdf

Download (103kB)
[img] Text
S_PEM_1700396_Appendix.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

Download (335kB)
Official URL: http://repository.upi.edu

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out how the description of the financial performance of conventional banks and Islamic banks in the 2015-2019 period which can be seen from the Risk Profile on liquidity risk is measured by Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) for conventional banks and Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) for Islamic banks, Earning is measured by Net Interest Margin (NIM) for conventional banks and Net Operating Margin (NOM) in Islamic banks and Capital is measured by Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), and to find out whether there are differences in conventional banks and Islamic banks with the research period 2015 – 2019. The research method used is descriptive and verification. The data used in this study is secondary data sourced from bank financial statements. The research population is 106 conventional commercial banks and 12 Islamic commercial banks registered in Indonesian banking statistics and Islamic banking statistics since 2015. The samples taken are 10 conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks, using purposive sampling technique. The data analysis technique used is descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. Hypothesis testing using Independent Sample T-test and Mann Whitney U-test. The results of hypothesis testing using the Independent Sample T-test show that there are no differences between conventional banks and Islamic banks in the Risk Profile on liquidity risk using the Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR)/Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) and Capital using the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of hypothesis testing using the Mann Whitney U-test show that there are differences in the earnings of conventional banks and Islamic banks using the Net Interest Margin (NIM)/Net Operating Margin (NOM).

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Conventional Bank, Islamic Bank, Risk Profile, Earning, Capital
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis > Manajemen (non kependidikan)
Depositing User: Julio Robih Pangestu
Date Deposited: 23 Nov 2021 06:21
Last Modified: 23 Nov 2021 06:21
URI: http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/69706

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item