PROFIL KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA DALAM MATERI SISTEM PENCERNAAN MAKANAN MELALUI PERAN BERTANYA GURU TIPE PARTICIPANT

Reza Nur Apprillia, - (2019) PROFIL KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA DALAM MATERI SISTEM PENCERNAAN MAKANAN MELALUI PERAN BERTANYA GURU TIPE PARTICIPANT. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

[img] Text
S_BIO_1500858_Title.pdf

Download (577kB)
[img] Text
S_BIO_1500858_Chapter1.pdf

Download (485kB)
[img] Text
S_BIO_1500858_Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

Download (449kB)
[img] Text
S_BIO_1500858_Chapter3.pdf

Download (593kB)
[img] Text
S_BIO_1500858_Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

Download (688kB)
[img] Text
S_BIO_1500858_Chapter5.pdf

Download (269kB)
[img] Text
S_BIO_1500858_Appendix.pdf
Restricted to Staf Perpustakaan

Download (612kB)
Official URL: http://repository.upi.edu

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi profil kemampuan argumentasi siswa SMA pada materi sistem pencernaan makanan melalui peran bertanya guru participant. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah siswa SMAN 4 Bandung dengan sampel penelitian kelas XI MIPA 3. Sampel diambil menggunakan teknik sampel purposive sampling berdasarkan kriteria rekomendasi dari guru yang menyatakan bahwa siswa dalam kelas tersebut paling aktif jika dibandingkan dengan siswa dari kelas lain Argumentasi pada penelitian ini diamati dalam dua bentuk, yaitu argumentasi oral dan tertulis. Peneliti mengumpulkan data dengan cara mengobservasi serta mendokumentasikan seluruh argumen yang diberikan siswa di dalam kelas saat pembelajaran dengan tipe participant berlangsung. Kemampuan argumentasi diidentifikasi berdasarkan komponen argumentasi Toulmin yaitu claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, dan rebuttal. Level kemampuan argumentasi diklasifikasi berdasarkan kemunculan komponen tersebut di dalam argumentasi siswa. Kemampuan argumentasi siswa juga diidentifikasi berdasarkan level kognitif siswa. Hasil dari penelitian ini diperoleh profil kemampuan argumentasi oral siswa masih berada di level 2 (34%) dan profil kemampuan argumentasi tertulis siswa sudah berada di level 3 (25%). Siswa dengan level kognitif tinggi mampu memberikan argumentasi oral sampai dengan level 2 (40%), sedangkan pada argumentasi tertulis, siswa dengan level kognitif tinggi sudah mampu mencapai level 3 (30%). Pada siswa dengan level kognitif rendah hanya mampu menyampaikan argumentasi oralnya mencapai di level 1 (34%), sedangkan argumen tertulis siswa dengan level kognitif rendah hanya mampu menyampaikan argumentasi tertulis sampai di level 2 (66%). Kata Kunci: Pendidikan, Kemampuan Argumentasi, Pertanyaan Guru, Sistem Pencernaan Makanan ------- This study aims to identify the ability profile of high school students’ argumentation on digestive system materials through teacher’s questioning in the role of participant type. The population in this study were students of SMAN 4 Bandung with class XI MIPA 3 as the research sample. Sample was taken using the purposive sampling technique based on teacher recommendations that stated that students in the class were most active compared to students from other classes. The argumentation in this study was observed in two forms, oral and written argumentation. Researchers collected data by observing and documentating all the arguments given by students in the class when learning with the participant type role of questioning. The ability of argumentation is identified based on Toulmin’s argumentation components: claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal. The level of argumentation ability is classified based on the appearance of these components in the student’s arguments. Students’ argumentation abilities are also identified based on their cognitive level. The result of this study obtained the profile ability of students’ oral argumentation is still at level 2 (34%) and the profile ability of students’ written argumentation is at level 3 (25%). Students with high cognitive levels are able to provide their oral argumentations up to level 2 (40%), whereas in written argumentation, students with high cognitive level are able to reach up to level 3 (30%). Students with low cognitive level are only able to convey their oral argumentation up to level 1 (34%), while their written argumentation ability are only able to reach up to level 2 (66%). Keywords : Education, Ability of Argumentation, Teacher’s Questioning, Digestive System

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Pendidikan, Kemampuan Argumentasi, Pertanyaan Guru, Sistem Pencernaan Makanan
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Divisions: Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi > Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi
Depositing User: Reza Nur Aprillia
Date Deposited: 09 Jul 2020 03:11
Last Modified: 09 Jul 2020 03:11
URI: http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/39868

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item