DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Aikenhead, G. (2003). STS Education: A Rose by Any Other Name. In R. Cross (Ed.), A Vision for Science Education: Responding to The Work of Peter J. Fensham (pp. 59-75). New York: Routledge Press.
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The Function of Multiple Representation. Computers and Education, 33, 131–152.
Akcay, B., & Akcay, H. (2015). Effectiveness of Science-Technology-Society (STS) Instruction on Student Understanding of the Nature of Science and Attitudes toward Science International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(1), 37-45. 
Anwar, K. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Menggunakan 4S TMD dengan Tema Pemanasan Global. Tesis SPS UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Anwar, S. (2014). Pengolahan Bahan Ajar: Bahan Perkuliahan SPS UPI. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung. 
Arifin. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Pada Tema Udara Berbasis Nilai Religius Menggunakan 4S TMD. Tesis SPS UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, Macmillan Publishers.
Binadja, A. (1999). STL (Science Technology Literacy) in the SETS (Science, Environtment, Technology, and Society) Education Perspective. Paper presented at the Regional Workshop on Scientific and Technological Literacy for All, Penang. 
Binadja, A. (Tanpa Tahun). Pedoman Pengembangan Bahan Pembelajaran Bervisi dan Berpendekatan SETS (Science, Environtment, Technology, and Society) atau (sains, Lingkungan, Teknologi, dan Masyarakat). Semarang: Laboratorium SETS UNNES.
Britt, A. M. & Sommer, J. (2010). Facilitating Textual Integration with Macro-structure Focusing Tasks. Reading Psychology, 25 (4),313-339. doi: 10.1080/02702710490522658.
Cakmak, M. (2010). An Examination of Concept Maps Created by Prospective Teachers on Teacher Roles. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2464-2468. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.354.
Cibik, S. A. & Yalcin, N. (2011). The Effect of Teaching the Direct Current Concept with Analogy Technique to the Attitudes of Science Education Students Toward Physics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2647-2651. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.163.
Chang, R. (2010). Chemistry 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Clay, S. E. (2012). Removing Arsenic and Lead From Soils using a Bioremediation Approach: Design, Implementation and Analysis of a Feasibility Study on Vashon Island, Washington. The Evergreen State Collage, Washington.   
Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2010). Juknis Pengembangan Bahan Ajar SMA. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2016). Panduan Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu SMP/MTs. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Dunne, J., Mahdi, A. E., & O'Reilly, J. (2013). Investigating the Potential of Irish Primary School Textbook in Supporting Inquiry Based-Science Education (IBSE). International Jurnal of Science Education, 35(3), 1513-1532. 
Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education in Three-part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic and Social Learning Goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07309371
EEA. (2007). Progress in Management of Contaminated Sites (CSI 015). from www.eea-europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-in-management-ofcontaminated-sites/progress-in-management-of-contaminated-1
Fogarty, R. (1991). The Mindful School: How to Integrate the Curricula (6 ed.). Palatine, Illinois: IRI/Skylight Publishing, Inc.
Foth, H. D. (1990). Fundamentals of soil science 8th ed. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Freeman, A. L. & Jessup, M. L. (2004). The Power and Benefits of Concept Mapping: Measuring Use, Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Satisfaction. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (2), 151-169. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000097361.
Gagne, R. M., W.Wager, W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2004). Principles of Instructional Design (5 ed.). Orlando: Harcourt Brace Collage Publisher.
Galagher, J. J. (1971). A Broader Base for Science Teaching Science Education, 55(3), 329-338. 
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Belanda: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Gilbert, K. J. (2010). The Role of Visual Representations in the Learning and Teaching of Science: An Introduction. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11 (1), 1-19.
Grüner, G. (1967). Die didaktische Reduktion als Kernstück der Didaktik [The didactic reduction as the core of didactics]. Die Deutsche Schule 7(8), 414-430.
Hardjowigeno, H. S. (2003). Ilmu Tanah. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Hasyim, A. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Tema Laut untuk Siswa SMP Melalui 4S TMD. Tesis SPS UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Hutchinson, T., Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. English Languange Teaching Journal, 48(4), 315-328
Ibrahim, M. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Inayah, N.S. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Dengan Tema Cuaca Menggunakan 4S TMD. Tesis SPS UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalangan, N., Mathew, B. B., & Beeregowa, K. N. (2014). Toxicity, Mechanism and Health Effects of Some Heavy Metals. Interdiscip Toxicology, 7(2), 60-72. 
Järup, L. (2003). Hazards of Heavy Metal Contamination. British Medical Bulletin 2003; 68: 167–182
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to a changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701–705.
Jolly, D., & Bolitho, R. (2011). A Framework for Materials Writing. In B. Tomlison (Ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jonane, L. (2015a). Using Analogies in Teaching Physics: A Study on Latvian Teachersí Views and Experience. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability,17 (2), 53-73. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2015-0011.
Jonane, L. (2015b). Analogies in Science Education. Pedagogika/Pedagogy, 119 (3), 116-125. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15823/p.2015.027.
Khutorskoi, A. V. (2006). The Place of the Textbook in the Didactic System. Russian Education & Society, 48(3), 78-93. doi: 10.2753/RES1060-9393480307
Kozma, R. (2003). The Material Features of Multiple Representations and their Cognitive and Social Affordances for Science Understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205-226. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X.
Kurnaz, A. M. & Arslan, S. (2013). Effectiveness of Multiple Representations for Learning Energy Concepts: Case of Turkey. Science Direct 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 116 (2014), 627-632. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.269.
Lau, K.-c. (2013). Impacts of a STSE High School Biology Course on The Scientific Literacy of Hong Kong Students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 1-25. 
Lee, O. (2001). Culture and Language in Science Education: What do We Know and What doo We Need to Know?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (5), 499-501.
Li, S. S. W & Arshad, Y. M. (2015). Application of Multiple Representation Levels in Redox Reactions among Tenth Grade Chemistry Teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11 (3), 35-51. doi: 10.12973/tused.10117a.
Liu, Y. & Khine, S. M. (2016). Content Analysis of The Diagrammatic Representations of Primary Science Textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science dan Technology Education, 12 (8), 1937-1951. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1288a.
Lucembe, D., Chinyama, K. & Jumbe, J. (2014). The Effect of Using Concept Mapping on Student’s Attitude and Achievement When Learning The Physics Topic of Circular and Rotational Motion. European Journal of Physics Education, 5 (4), 10-29. 
Maharaj, S. R., & Sharma. (2017). Analogies in Physics Teaching: Experiences of Trinidadian Physics Teachers. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 65-80.
Mansour, N. (2009). Science-Technology-Society (STS): A New Paradigm in Science Education. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 29, 287-297. 
Mbajiorgu, N. M., & Ali, A. (2003). Relationship between STS approach, scientific literacy, and achievement in biology. Science Education, 87(1), 31-39. doi: 10.1002/sce.10012
Minarti, I. B., Susilowati, S. M. E., & Indriyanti, D. R. (2012). Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Bervisi SETS Berbasis Edutainment pada Tema Pencernaan. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 1, 105-111. 
Mursalin, E. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bervisi SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, and Society) dan Berbasis Kewirausahaan Kimia (Chemoenterpreneurship) Kompetensi Terkait Hidrokarbon dan Minyak Bumi. Majalah Ilmiah Pawiyatan Edisi Khusus, XXII No. 2.
National Comitte on Science Education Standards and Assessment, National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
Noeraida. (2015). Penggunaan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Tipe Integrated dalam Pembelajaran Tema Sinar Matahari dan Kehidupan di Bumi untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa. Tesis SPS UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Novak J. D. & Gowin D. B. (1984), Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Novak J. D. & Musonda D. (1991), A Twelve-year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117-153.
Novak, D. J & Gowin, B. D. (2006). Learning How to Learn. USA: Cambridge Univercity Press. 
Novak, D. J. (1990). Concept Mapping: A Useful Tool for Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 27 (10), 937-949.
Novak, J. D. (1977). A Theory of Education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6 (3), 21-30.
Nugraha, A. D., Binadja, A., & Supartono. (2013). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Reaksi Redoks Bervisi SETS, Berorientasi Konstruktivis. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 2(1). 
OECD. (2004). Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World, Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). PISA  2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pedretti, E. (2003). Teaching Science, Technology, Society and Environment (STSE) Education: Preservice Teachers’ Philosophical and Pedagogical Landscapes. In D. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of Moral Reasoning on Socio-scientiﬁc Issues and Discourse in Science Education (pp. 219-240). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Pedretti, E., & Bellomo, K. (2013). A Time for Change: Advocating for STSE Education Through Professional Learning Communities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(4), 415-437. doi: 10.1080/14926156.2012.679996
Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Current in STSE Education: Mapping a Complex Field, 40 Years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601-626. 
Peraturan Menteri pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No.21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Peraturan Menteri pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No.22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Peraturan Menteri pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No.24 Tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Peraturan Menteri pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No.58 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 SMP/MTS. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Prastowo, A. (2014). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik: Tinjauan Teoritis dan Praktik. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Rankin, E. F., & Culhane, J. W. (1969). Comparable Cloze and Multiple-Choice Comprehension Test Scores Journal of Reading, 13(3), 193-198. 
Raouf, A., & Raheim, A. (2017). Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Waste Water by Biomass-Based Materials: A Review. Journal of Pollution Effects & Control, 5(1). doi: 10.4172/2375-4397.1000180
Reece, J.B., Campbell N. A. (2011). Campbell Biology 9th edition. Boston: Benjamin Cummings/Pearson.
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of Instructional Design and Development. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2, 1099-1130. 
Rustaman, N.Y. (2012). Apendiks Literasi Sains [power point]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
Safdar, M., Hussain, A., Shah, I. & Rifat, Q. (2015). Concept Maps: An Instructional Tool to Facilitate Meaningful Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 55-64.
Sakiyo, J & Waziri, K. (2015). Concept Mapping Strategy: An Effective Tool To Improving Students’ Academic in Biology. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, (1) 56-62. Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of The Field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communication and Technology.
Science Communication Unit, University of the West of England, Bristol (2013). Science for Environment Policy In-depth Report: Soil Contamination: Impacts on Human Health. Report produced for the European Commission DG Environment, September 2013.
Schroeder, M., Mckeough, A., Graham, S., Stock, H., & Bisanz, G. (2008). The Contribution of Trade Books to Early Science Literacy: In and Out of School. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 231-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9082-0
Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of the Field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communication and Technology.
Sellmann, D, Lieflander, K. A. & Bogner, X. F. (2015). Concept Maps in the Clasroom: A New Approach to Reveal Students Conceptual Change. The Journal of Educational Research. 1-8. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.896315.
Setiadi, R. (2014). Penerapan Analisis Wacana dalam Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Materi Pokok Pada Kegiatan Workshop Penulisan Bahan Ajar di Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA UPI. Tidak diterbitkan.
Slavin, R. E. (1992). Research Methods in Education (2 ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sutedjo, M. M., Kartasapoetra A. G. (2002). Pengantar Ilmu Tanah. Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S. & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.
Torit, J., Siangdung, W., & Thiravetyan, P. (2012). Phosporus Removal from Domestic Wastewater by Echinodorus cordifolius L. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 47(5), 794-800. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2012.660114
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368
Treagust, David, Ghail, Chittleborough dan Mamiala, Tapelo. (2003). The Role of Submicroscopic and Symbolic Representations in Chemical Explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (11),1353-1368.
Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P. & Waldrip, B. (2013). Constructing Representations to Learn in Science. Boston: Sense Publishers.
Van Dijk, A. T. (1980). Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Carolan, J. (2006). Learning Junior Secondary Science through Multi-Modal Representations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11 (1), 87-107.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Carolan, J. (2010). Using Multi-Modal Representations to Improve Learning in Junior Secondary Science. Res Sci Educ. 40, 65-80. doi 10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6.
Wei, W., & Xia, W. (2016). The Improvement of Students' Scientific Literacy based on Biology Concept Teaching Paper presented at the 4th International Education, Economics, Social Science, Arts, Sports and Management Engineering Conference (IEESASM 2016), Yinchuan, China.
Werwa, E., Zike D. (2005). Glencoe Science: Chemistry. Columbus: McGraw-Hill.
William, W. C. (1991). Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science. Educational Resources Information Center, 2-41.
Winkel. (2009). Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi.
Yager, S. O., Yager, R. E., & Lim, G. (2006). The Advantages of an STS Approach Over a Typical Textbook Dominated Approach in Middle School Science. School Science and Mathematics, 106(5), 248-260. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18083.x
Yulipriyanto, H. (2010). Biologi Tanah dan Strategi Pengolahannya. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Yörük, N., Morgil, I., & Seçken, N. (2010). The Effects of Science, Technology, Society, Environment (STSE) Interactions on Teaching Chemistry Natural Science, 2(12), 1417-1424.